Sazmining Review 2026
Last updated: July 2026 · Rated 7.0/10 by our methodology
Renewable-only host with a revenue-share model (15–20%) instead of kWh pricing and direct pool payouts — read the year-1 hardware forfeiture clause before signing. Sazmining's founding year is not publicly verifiable.
Datasheet
| Founded | not publicly verifiable |
|---|---|
| Business model | hosting |
| Headquarters | Wyoming, USA |
| Facilities | Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), Norway, Ethiopia |
| Price (all-in) | on request / model-dependent |
| Setup fee | None published |
| Minimum term | 12 months |
| Payout | Weekly (configurable), direct from pool (Luxor/OCEAN) to own wallet |
| Trustpilot | 4 / 5 (66 reviews) |
| Known incidents | Paraguay site launch delays (2025) |
| Supported miners | Antminer S21 series |
Score breakdown
| Criterion | Weight | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 30% | 7/10 |
| Track record | 30% | 6.5/10 |
| Transparency | 20% | 7.5/10 |
| Support | 20% | 7.5/10 |
| Total | 7.0/10 |
Pros & cons
Pros
- 100% renewable (hydro) sites
- Revenue-share instead of kWh markup (PY 15%, NO 20%, ET 15%)
- Direct pool payouts to own wallet
Cons
- No classic kWh price — revenue share needs comparing per case
- Hardware forfeits if cancelled within year 1 (!)
- Founding year not publicly verifiable
Affiliate disclosure: Outbound links to Sazmining may be affiliate links. This never influences the rating above — see our methodology.